UAE forensic audit & investigation support
Senior-led reviewProposal response within one business daySecure & confidential
UAE forensic audit & investigation support

When the numbers
do not add up,
establish the facts.

Confidential, evidence-led support for boards, shareholders, management and advisers facing suspected fraud, asset misuse, unusual transactions or financial disputes.

Senior-led reviewOne-business-day responseConfidential assessment

Request Confidential Assessment

Share the essential facts and any immediate evidence concern. A senior professional will review the matter confidentially within one business day.

Secure and confidential · No obligation · Privacy policy

Secure and confidential · No obligation · Privacy policy

G5.0★★★★★177 public Google reviews
“Very detailed reports.”Muhammad Hashir · Google review
“Meticulous approach.”Abullahashraf · Google review
View Google profile →
Confidential fact-finding

Start with the concern, authority to investigate and evidence risk.

A forensic engagement must be carefully scoped around the allegation, available records, lawful access and intended use of the findings.

Question

Define the allegation or disputed issue

Turn a broad concern into specific, testable financial questions.

→
Authority

Confirm who may instruct and access records

Agree the mandate, reporting line and lawful access before collection.

→
Evidence

Identify records at immediate risk

Prioritise information that could change, disappear or lose context.

→
Reporting

Set the intended use and limitations

Clarify who receives findings and how uncertainties will be presented.

→

Initial discussions are confidential. Scope, access and reporting limitations are documented before investigative work begins.

Confidential intakeSensitive enquiries handled discreetly
Evidence-ledConclusions tied to reviewed information
Defined authorityAccess and reporting lines agreed
Senior oversightExperienced judgement at key stages
Forensic review by concern

Shape the engagement around the question that must be answered.

No outcome is assumed in advance; the work tests the available evidence against the defined concern.

Fraud concern

Suspected fraud or manipulation

Review allegations, accounting records and transaction patterns without presuming the conclusion.

Discuss confidentially →
Assets

Misappropriation or unauthorised use

Trace selected payments, assets or benefits and identify the available supporting evidence.

Discuss confidentially →
Transactions

Unusual transaction review

Examine counterparties, approvals, documentation and fund flows around defined transactions.

Discuss confidentially →
Dispute

Shareholder, vendor or management dispute

Provide an independent financial review of the questions and records within the agreed scope.

Discuss confidentially →
What you receive

A controlled forensic engagement built around evidence and purpose.

The allegation, authority, access, methodology, limitations and reporting route are agreed before substantive work.

01
Confidential scope

Define the question before collecting large volumes of data.

The concern, entities, period, stakeholders, access and intended output are documented.

Request Confidential Assessment →
02

Evidence preservation plan

Priority records and potential evidence risks are identified at the beginning.

03

Transaction analysis

Ledgers, bank flows, counterparties and supporting documents are examined within scope.

04

Interviews & corroboration

Relevant explanations are compared with records and other available evidence.

05

Factual reporting

Findings, limitations and unresolved matters are presented without overstating the evidence.

Who is accountable

Senior judgement stays close to sensitive investigative decisions.

Forensic work requires disciplined scoping, careful handling of evidence and experienced review of what the records do—and do not—support.

Imran SethiSenior Audit Partner · UAE assurance and advisory
Confidential scope reviewAuthority, evidence risk and intended use are considered before work begins.
Controlled communicationReporting lines and sensitive discussions are kept clear throughout the engagement.
ICAEWACCAProfessional qualifications represented within the wider RT team.
From concern to findings

A controlled path from allegation to evidence-led reporting.

The sequence protects focus, proportionality and clear decision-making.

01

Confidential intake

Understand the concern, authority, stakeholders, urgency and intended use.

02

Preserve & collect

Identify priority evidence and collect authorised records in a controlled manner.

03

Analyse & corroborate

Test transactions, documents and explanations against the defined questions.

04

Findings & next steps

Report supported findings, limitations and matters requiring further action.

Prepare efficiently

Secure the records most likely to preserve the factual trail.

The collection plan depends on the concern and lawful access, but these categories often matter.

Request Confidential Assessment →
✓Allegation & chronologyKnown concerns, dates, people, entities and prior actions.
✓Ledgers & bank dataTransaction listings, statements, payment files and reconciliations.
✓Contracts & invoicesAgreements, purchase records, invoices and supporting approvals.
✓Systems & communicationsAuthorised system extracts, correspondence and access records.
✓Ownership & authorityEntity records, mandates, delegated authority and related parties.
✓Prior reviewsComplaints, internal reports, audit findings and legal correspondence.
Public client feedback

Audit detail and professional delivery, reflected in public feedback.

Audit-relevant reviews are shown first, followed by feedback covering the wider RT team’s business support.

Google
5.0★★★★★177 public reviews
Read all reviews →
MHMuhammad HashirGoogle review
★★★★★
“Very detailed reports.”

Commended the professionalism and detail of the auditing service.

AAAbullahashrafGoogle review
★★★★★
“Meticulous approach.”

Described RT as a trustworthy audit firm that exceeded expectations.

MKMeroolai KhonGoogle review
★★★★★
“Quickly, professionally.”

Highlighted responsive communication and efficient delivery.

MSMaryam SultanGoogle review
★★★★★
“Highly satisfied!”

Praised the team’s long-term support, dedication and professionalism.

ISIqi SaabGoogle review
★★★★★
“Always adding value.”

Recognised friendly service, useful advice and continued business support.

MSMita SrinivasanGoogle review
★★★★★
“A great service.”

Recommended the team to small businesses seeking reliable accounting support.

Get a written starting point

Request a confidential review of the concern and available evidence.

Tell us what has been identified, who has authority to instruct the work and whether evidence is at immediate risk. A senior professional will respond confidentially.

Written scope and professional feeTailored information requestClear delivery plan
Request Confidential Assessment →

Request Confidential Assessment

Share the essential facts and any immediate evidence concern. A senior professional will review the matter confidentially within one business day. No obligation. Privacy policy.

Before a forensic review

Questions that shape the engagement.

Confidentiality, access, evidence handling, scope and intended use should be clear before work begins.

Call the audit team

Questions decision-makers ask about forensic audit work

Initial enquiries are handled confidentially and the reporting line is agreed before substantive work. The organisation should still limit internal circulation and follow any legal advice regarding privilege or disclosure.

Preserve records that may change or disappear, including accounting data, bank information, approvals, contracts, invoices, access logs and authorised communications. Do not alter systems or collect data outside your lawful authority.

A forensic review does not assume fraud and cannot guarantee a predetermined conclusion. It evaluates available evidence against defined questions and reports supported findings, limitations and unresolved matters.

Yes. Where appropriate, the engagement can be coordinated with appointed legal advisers so responsibilities, access, communications and intended use are clearly defined. Legal privilege itself should be addressed by counsel.

Timing depends on the number of entities, data volume, access, complexity and whether new issues emerge. A phased approach can provide early priorities while preserving a disciplined overall scope.

External audit is designed to express an opinion on financial statements. Forensic work investigates defined concerns, transactions or events and uses a more targeted evidence-gathering and analysis approach.