Define the allegation or disputed issue
Turn a broad concern into specific, testable financial questions.
→Confidential, evidence-led support for boards, shareholders, management and advisers facing suspected fraud, asset misuse, unusual transactions or financial disputes.
Share the essential facts and any immediate evidence concern. A senior professional will review the matter confidentially within one business day.
Secure and confidential · No obligation · Privacy policy
Secure and confidential · No obligation · Privacy policy
“Very detailed reports.”Muhammad Hashir · Google review
“Meticulous approach.”Abullahashraf · Google reviewView Google profile →
A forensic engagement must be carefully scoped around the allegation, available records, lawful access and intended use of the findings.
Turn a broad concern into specific, testable financial questions.
→Agree the mandate, reporting line and lawful access before collection.
→Prioritise information that could change, disappear or lose context.
→Clarify who receives findings and how uncertainties will be presented.
→Initial discussions are confidential. Scope, access and reporting limitations are documented before investigative work begins.
No outcome is assumed in advance; the work tests the available evidence against the defined concern.
Review allegations, accounting records and transaction patterns without presuming the conclusion.
Discuss confidentially →Trace selected payments, assets or benefits and identify the available supporting evidence.
Discuss confidentially →Examine counterparties, approvals, documentation and fund flows around defined transactions.
Discuss confidentially →Provide an independent financial review of the questions and records within the agreed scope.
Discuss confidentially →The allegation, authority, access, methodology, limitations and reporting route are agreed before substantive work.

The concern, entities, period, stakeholders, access and intended output are documented.
Request Confidential Assessment →Priority records and potential evidence risks are identified at the beginning.
Ledgers, bank flows, counterparties and supporting documents are examined within scope.
Relevant explanations are compared with records and other available evidence.
Findings, limitations and unresolved matters are presented without overstating the evidence.
Forensic work requires disciplined scoping, careful handling of evidence and experienced review of what the records do—and do not—support.




The sequence protects focus, proportionality and clear decision-making.
Understand the concern, authority, stakeholders, urgency and intended use.
Identify priority evidence and collect authorised records in a controlled manner.
Test transactions, documents and explanations against the defined questions.
Report supported findings, limitations and matters requiring further action.

The collection plan depends on the concern and lawful access, but these categories often matter.
Request Confidential Assessment →Audit-relevant reviews are shown first, followed by feedback covering the wider RT team’s business support.
“Very detailed reports.”
Commended the professionalism and detail of the auditing service.
“Meticulous approach.”
Described RT as a trustworthy audit firm that exceeded expectations.
“Quickly, professionally.”
Highlighted responsive communication and efficient delivery.
“Highly satisfied!”
Praised the team’s long-term support, dedication and professionalism.
“Always adding value.”
Recognised friendly service, useful advice and continued business support.
“A great service.”
Recommended the team to small businesses seeking reliable accounting support.
Tell us what has been identified, who has authority to instruct the work and whether evidence is at immediate risk. A senior professional will respond confidentially.
Share the essential facts and any immediate evidence concern. A senior professional will review the matter confidentially within one business day. No obligation. Privacy policy.
Confidentiality, access, evidence handling, scope and intended use should be clear before work begins.
Call the audit teamInitial enquiries are handled confidentially and the reporting line is agreed before substantive work. The organisation should still limit internal circulation and follow any legal advice regarding privilege or disclosure.
Preserve records that may change or disappear, including accounting data, bank information, approvals, contracts, invoices, access logs and authorised communications. Do not alter systems or collect data outside your lawful authority.
A forensic review does not assume fraud and cannot guarantee a predetermined conclusion. It evaluates available evidence against defined questions and reports supported findings, limitations and unresolved matters.
Yes. Where appropriate, the engagement can be coordinated with appointed legal advisers so responsibilities, access, communications and intended use are clearly defined. Legal privilege itself should be addressed by counsel.
Timing depends on the number of entities, data volume, access, complexity and whether new issues emerge. A phased approach can provide early priorities while preserving a disciplined overall scope.
External audit is designed to express an opinion on financial statements. Forensic work investigates defined concerns, transactions or events and uses a more targeted evidence-gathering and analysis approach.